Cited 0 times in
Differential prognostic impact of treatment strategy among patients with left main versus non-left main bifurcation lesions undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the COBIS (Coronary Bifurcation Stenting) Registry II.
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Song, YB | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hahn, JY | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yang, JH | - |
dc.contributor.author | Choi, SH | - |
dc.contributor.author | Choi, JH | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, SH | - |
dc.contributor.author | Jeong, MH | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, HS | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, JH | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yu, CW | - |
dc.contributor.author | Rha, SW | - |
dc.contributor.author | Jang, Y | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yoon, JH | - |
dc.contributor.author | Tahk, SJ | - |
dc.contributor.author | Seung, KB | - |
dc.contributor.author | Oh, JH | - |
dc.contributor.author | Park, JS | - |
dc.contributor.author | Gwon, HC | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-04-06T05:56:32Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-04-06T05:56:32Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1936-8798 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.ajou.ac.kr/handle/201003/12355 | - |
dc.description.abstract | OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to investigate whether the impact of treatment
strategies on clinical outcomes differed between patients with left main (LM) bifurcation lesions and those with non-LM bifurcation lesions. BACKGROUND: Few studies have considered anatomic location when comparing 1- and 2-stent strategies for bifurcation lesions. METHODS: We compared the prognostic impact of treatment strategies on clinical outcomes in 2,044 patients with non-LM bifurcation lesions and 853 with LM bifurcation lesions. The primary outcome was target lesion failure (TLF) defined as a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target lesion revascularization. RESULTS: The 2-stent strategy was used more frequently in the LM bifurcation group than in the non-LM bifurcation group (40.3% vs. 20.8%, p < 0.01). During a median follow-up of 36 months, the 2-stent strategy was not associated with a higher incidence of cardiac death (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.72 to 2.14; p = 0.44), cardiac death or MI (HR: 1.12; 95% CI: 0.58 to 2.19; p = 0.73), or TLF (HR: 1.39; 95% CI: 0.99 to 1.94; p = 0.06) in the non-LM bifurcation group. In contrast, in patients with LM bifurcation lesions, the 2-stent strategy was associated with a higher incidence of cardiac death (HR: 2.43; 95% CI: 1.05 to 5.59; p = 0.04), cardiac death or MI (HR: 2.09; 95% CI: 1.08 to 4.04; p = 0.03), as well as TLF (HR: 2.38; 95% CI: 1.60 to 3.55; p < 0.01). Significant interactions were present between treatment strategies and bifurcation lesion locations for TLF (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The 1-stent strategy, if possible, should initially be considered the preferred approach for the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions, especially LM bifurcation lesions. (Korean Coronary Bifurcation Stenting [COBIS] Registry II; NCT01642992). | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Aged | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Cause of Death | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Confidence Intervals | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Coronary Angiography | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Coronary Artery Disease | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Coronary Vessels | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Female | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Follow-Up Studies | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Humans | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Incidence | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Male | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Middle Aged | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Percutaneous Coronary Intervention | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Postoperative Complications | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Practice Guidelines as Topic | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Prosthesis Design | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Registries | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Republic of Korea | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Retrospective Studies | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Stents | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Survival Rate | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Time Factors | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Treatment Outcome | - |
dc.title | Differential prognostic impact of treatment strategy among patients with left main versus non-left main bifurcation lesions undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the COBIS (Coronary Bifurcation Stenting) Registry II. | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 24529936 | - |
dc.identifier.url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1936879814000478 | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | 탁, 승제 | - |
dc.type.local | Journal Papers | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.11.009 | - |
dc.citation.title | JACC. Cardiovascular interventions | - |
dc.citation.volume | 7 | - |
dc.citation.number | 3 | - |
dc.citation.date | 2014 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 255 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 263 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | JACC. Cardiovascular interventions, 7(3). : 255-263, 2014 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1876-7605 | - |
dc.relation.journalid | J019368798 | - |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.