Cited 0 times in Scipus Cited Count

Measurement of diabetes-related emotional distress using the Problem Areas in Diabetes scale: psychometric evaluations show that the short form is better than the full form.

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorLee, EH-
dc.contributor.authorLee, YW-
dc.contributor.authorLee, KW-
dc.contributor.authorKim, YS-
dc.contributor.authorNam, MS-
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-20T05:17:09Z-
dc.date.available2016-04-20T05:17:09Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.ajou.ac.kr/handle/201003/12399-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) scale is widely used for

measuring diabetes-related emotional distress. There has been debate over the

last 2 decades about the underlying factorial-construct validity of the PAID,

with one- to four-factor structures being reported. A short form of the PAID,

which comprises five items (PAID-5), was recently developed using Western

patients with type 2 diabetes. This study measured the psychometric properties of

the full and short forms of the PAID in Korean patients with type 2 diabetes,

with the aim of determining which form is preferable. METHODS: The PAID and

PAID-5 were translated into Korean (K-PAID and K-PAID-5, respectively) using a

forward-and-backward translation technique. The study participants were recruited

from university hospitals. The factorial-construct, convergent, and known-groups

validity, and internal-consistency and test-retest reliability of both the K-PAID

and K-PAID-5 were evaluated. RESULTS: For the K-PAID, confirmatory factor

analysis revealed a marginal fit to the one-, two-, three-, and four-factor

models. The three- and four-factor models of the K-PAID partially satisfied the

internal-consistency and test-retest reliability, and convergent and known-groups

validity. For the K-PAID-5, confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated an

excellent fit to the one-factor model, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.87 and an

intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.89. The K-PAID-5 satisfied the convergent

validity, as evaluated using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression

Scale and hemoglobin A1c. Known-groups validity by gender was also satisfied.

CONCLUSIONS: The K-PAID-5 demonstrated excellent psychometric properties as a

one-factor scale. The brevity of the K-PAID-5 represents a major advantage in a

practical context in that it may impose a minimum burden upon patients with

diabetes.
-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.subject.MESHAdult-
dc.subject.MESHAged-
dc.subject.MESHAged, 80 and over-
dc.subject.MESHDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2-
dc.subject.MESHFactor Analysis, Statistical-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHPsychometrics-
dc.subject.MESHQuality of Life-
dc.subject.MESHReproducibility of Results-
dc.subject.MESHRepublic of Korea-
dc.subject.MESHStress, Psychological-
dc.subject.MESHSurveys and Questionnaires-
dc.titleMeasurement of diabetes-related emotional distress using the Problem Areas in Diabetes scale: psychometric evaluations show that the short form is better than the full form.-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.pmid25358396-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4215007/-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor이, 관우-
dc.type.localJournal Papers-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12955-014-0142-z-
dc.citation.titleHealth and quality of life outcomes-
dc.citation.volume12-
dc.citation.date2014-
dc.citation.startPage142-
dc.citation.endPage142-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationHealth and quality of life outcomes, 12. : 142-142, 2014-
dc.identifier.eissn1477-7525-
dc.relation.journalidJ014777525-
Appears in Collections:
Journal Papers > School of Medicine / Graduate School of Medicine > Endocrinology & Metabolism
Files in This Item:
25358396.pdfDownload

qrcode

해당 아이템을 이메일로 공유하기 원하시면 인증을 거치시기 바랍니다.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse