Cited 0 times in
Intravenous lidocaine pretreatment with venous occlusion for reducing microemulsion propofol induced pain: comparison of three doses of lidocaine.
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Kim, DH | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chae, YJ | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chang, HS | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, JA | - |
dc.contributor.author | Joe, HB | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-11-14T04:38:40Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-11-14T04:38:40Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0300-0605 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.ajou.ac.kr/handle/201003/12846 | - |
dc.description.abstract | OBJECTIVE: Pretreatment with intravenous 40 mg or 0.5 mg/kg lidocaine with venous
occlusion is recommended to prevent pain following injection of lipid emulsion propofol. This approach is not sufficient to prevent pain from the injection of microemulsion propofol. The present study investigated whether a higher dose of lidocaine pretreatment with venous occlusion would be more effective for reducing pain following injection of microemulsion propofol compared with 40 mg lidocaine. METHODS: Patients undergoing elective surgery were randomly assigned to one of three groups: pretreatment with 40 mg (group L40), 60 mg (group L60) or 80 mg (group L80) lidocaine intravenously with venous occlusion, followed by injection with microemulsion propofol 1 min later. Pain was assessed on a four-point scale (severe, moderate, mild, none) based on physical responses to the injection. RESULTS: A total of 68 patients were included in the final analysis. Pain severity and incidence were significantly lower in patients in group L60 and L80 compared with patients in group L40. There were no statistically significant differences in pain incidence or severity between group L60 and group L80. CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment with 60 mg lidocaine intravenously with venous occlusion may be the most effective minimum dose for reducing injection pain following microemulsion propofol administration for induction of anaesthesia. | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Administration, Intravenous | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Anesthetics, Intravenous | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Anesthetics, Local | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Double-Blind Method | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Humans | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Lidocaine | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Pain | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Pain Management | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Pain Measurement | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Propofol | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Treatment Outcome | - |
dc.title | Intravenous lidocaine pretreatment with venous occlusion for reducing microemulsion propofol induced pain: comparison of three doses of lidocaine. | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 24595146 | - |
dc.identifier.url | http://imr.sagepub.com/content/42/2/368.long | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | 김, 대희 | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | 채, 윤정 | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | 조, 한범 | - |
dc.type.local | Journal Papers | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/0300060513507391 | - |
dc.citation.title | The Journal of international medical research | - |
dc.citation.volume | 42 | - |
dc.citation.number | 2 | - |
dc.citation.date | 2014 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 368 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 375 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | The Journal of international medical research, 42(2). : 368-375, 2014 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1473-2300 | - |
dc.relation.journalid | J003000605 | - |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.