Cited 0 times in
Comparison of clinical efficacy and safety between indacaterol and tiotropium in COPD: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Kim, JS | - |
dc.contributor.author | Park, J | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lim, SY | - |
dc.contributor.author | Oh, YM | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yoo, KH | - |
dc.contributor.author | Park, YB | - |
dc.contributor.author | Sheen, SS | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, MJ | - |
dc.contributor.author | Carriere, KC | - |
dc.contributor.author | Jung, JY | - |
dc.contributor.author | Park, HY | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-06-14T05:02:33Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-06-14T05:02:33Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.ajou.ac.kr/handle/201003/14167 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Two once-daily inhaled bronchodilators, indacaterol and tiotropium, are widely used as first-line therapy in stable COPD patients. This study was performed to compare the clinical efficacy and safety between indacaterol and tiotropium in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched to identify all published randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The primary outcome was trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) at week 12. Four RCTs were eligible for inclusion (three RCTs with moderate-to-severe COPD patients and one RCT with only severe COPD patients). Trough FEV₁ at weeks 12 and 26 were not significantly different between indacaterol and tiotropium by the standardized mean difference with 0.014 (95% CI, -0.036, 0.063, I²= 23.5%) and with 0.037 (95% CI, -0.059 to 0.133, I²= 0%) along with differences in means of 0.003L and 0.014L, respectively. Indacaterol and tiotropium also showed similar St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total scores and percentages of patients with SGRQ improvement (≥ 4 units) at week 26. The incidences of nasopharyngitis, serious cardiovascular events, and serious adverse events were not different between indacaterol and tiotropium, while those of cough (OR = 1.68, P < 0.001, and RR = 1.63) and COPD worsening (OR = 1.18, P = 0.003, and RR = 1.12) were higher for indacaterol than tiotropium. However, when one study with only severe COPD patients was removed from the meta-analysis, the difference in the incidence of COPD worsening between indacaterol and tiotropium became non-significant (OR = 1.13, P = 0.204, and RR = 1.09). The clinical efficacy and serious adverse events between indacaterol and tiotropium were equivocal in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD. Cough is a common complaint associated with indacaterol, and COPD worsening needs to be carefully monitored in severe COPD patients when treated with indacaterol. | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Bronchodilator Agents | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Forced Expiratory Volume | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Humans | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Indans | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Quinolones | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Tiotropium Bromide | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Treatment Outcome | - |
dc.title | Comparison of clinical efficacy and safety between indacaterol and tiotropium in COPD: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 25799171 | - |
dc.identifier.url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4370711/ | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | 신, 승수 | - |
dc.type.local | Journal Papers | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1371/journal.pone.0119948 | - |
dc.citation.title | PloS one | - |
dc.citation.volume | 10 | - |
dc.citation.number | 3 | - |
dc.citation.date | 2015 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | e0119948 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | e0119948 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | PloS one, 10(3). : e0119948-e0119948, 2015 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1932-6203 | - |
dc.relation.journalid | J019326203 | - |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.