Cited 0 times in
Screening Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Prediction Model for Assessing Immediate Therapeutic Response to Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation of Uterine Fibroids
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Kim, YS | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lim, HK | - |
dc.contributor.author | Park, MJ | - |
dc.contributor.author | Rhim, H | - |
dc.contributor.author | Jung, SH | - |
dc.contributor.author | Sohn, I | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, TJ | - |
dc.contributor.author | Keserci, B | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-05-04T00:26:30Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-05-04T00:26:30Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0020-9996 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.ajou.ac.kr/handle/201003/15144 | - |
dc.description.abstract | OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to fit and validate screening magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based prediction models for assessing immediate therapeutic responses of uterine fibroids to MRI-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (MR-HIFU) ablation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Informed consent from all subjects was obtained for our institutional review board-approved study. A total of 240 symptomatic uterine fibroids (mean diameter, 6.9 cm) in 152 women (mean age, 43.3 years) treated with MR-HIFU ablation were retrospectively analyzed (160 fibroids for training, 80 fibroids for validation). Screening MRI parameters (subcutaneous fat thickness [mm], x1: relative peak enhancement [%] in semiquantitative perfusion MRI, x2: T2 signal intensity ratio of fibroid to skeletal muscle, x3) were used to fit prediction models with regard to ablation efficiency (nonperfused volume/treatment cell volume, y1) and ablation quality (grade 1-5, poor to excellent, y2), respectively, using the generalized estimating equation method. Cutoff values for achievement of treatment intent (efficiency >1.0: quality grade 4/5) were determined based on receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Prediction performances were validated by calculating positive and negative predictive values. RESULTS: Generalized estimating equation analyses yielded models of y1 = 2.2637 - 0.0415x1 - 0.0011x2 - 0.0772x3 and y2 = 6.8148 - 0.1070x1 - 0.0050x2 - 0.2163x3. Cutoff values were 1.312 for ablation efficiency (area under the curve, 0.7236: sensitivity, 0.6882: specificity, 0.6866) and 4.019 for ablation quality (0.8794: 0.7156: 0.9020). Positive and negative predictive values were 0.917 and 0.500 for ablation efficiency and 0.978 and 0.600 for ablation quality, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Screening MRI-based prediction models for assessing immediate therapeutic responses of uterine fibroids to MR-HIFU ablation were fitted and validated, which may reduce the risk of unsuccessful treatment. | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Adult | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Female | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Gynecologic Surgical Procedures | - |
dc.subject.MESH | High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Humans | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Leiomyoma | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Magnetic Resonance Imaging | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Middle Aged | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Models, Theoretical | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Predictive Value of Tests | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Retrospective Studies | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Surgery, Computer-Assisted | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Uterine Neoplasms | - |
dc.title | Screening Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Prediction Model for Assessing Immediate Therapeutic Response to Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation of Uterine Fibroids | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 26309184 | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | 박, 민정 | - |
dc.type.local | Journal Papers | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000199 | - |
dc.citation.title | Investigative radiology | - |
dc.citation.volume | 51 | - |
dc.citation.number | 1 | - |
dc.citation.date | 2016 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 15 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 24 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | Investigative radiology, 51(1). : 15-24, 2016 | - |
dc.embargo.liftdate | 9999-12-31 | - |
dc.embargo.terms | 9999-12-31 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1536-0210 | - |
dc.relation.journalid | J000209996 | - |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.