Cited 0 times in
Identification of Coronary Artery Side Branch Supplying Myocardial Mass That May Benefit From Revascularization
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Kim, HY | - |
dc.contributor.author | Doh, JH | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lim, HS | - |
dc.contributor.author | Nam, CW | - |
dc.contributor.author | Shin, ES | - |
dc.contributor.author | Koo, BK | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, JM | - |
dc.contributor.author | Park, TK | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yang, JH | - |
dc.contributor.author | Song, YB | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hahn, JY | - |
dc.contributor.author | Choi, SH | - |
dc.contributor.author | Gwon, HC | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, SH | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, SM | - |
dc.contributor.author | Choe, Y | - |
dc.contributor.author | Choi, JH | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-08-24T01:48:44Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-08-24T01:48:44Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1936-8798 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.ajou.ac.kr/handle/201003/15890 | - |
dc.description.abstract | OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to identify whether a coronary side branch (SB) is supplying a myocardial mass that may benefit from revascularization.
BACKGROUND: The amount of subtending myocardium and physiological stenosis is frequently different between the main vessel (MV) and SB. METHODS: In this multicenter registry, 482 patients who underwent coronary computed tomography angiography and fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement were enrolled. The % fractional myocardial mass (FMM), the ratio of vessel-specific myocardial mass to whole myocardium, was assessed in 5,860 MV or SB consisting of 2,930 bifurcations. Physiological stenosis was defined by fractional flow reserve (FFR) <0.80. Myocardial mass that may benefit from revascularization was defined by %FMM >/=10%. RESULTS: In per-bifurcation analysis, MV supplied a 1.5- to 9-fold larger myocardial mass compared with SB. Unlike left main bifurcation (n = 482), only 1 of every 5 non-left main SB (n = 2,448) supplied %FMM >/=10% (97% vs. 21%: p < 0.001). SB length >/=73 mm could estimate %FMM >/=10% (c-statistic = 0.85: p < 0.001). In 604 vessels interrogated by FFR, diameter stenosis was similar (p = NS), but %FMM >/=10%, FMM/minimal luminal diameter, and frequency of FFR <0.80 was higher in MV compared with SB (p < 0.001, all). Generalized estimating equations modeling demonstrate that vessel diameter, left myocardial mass, and FFR were not (p = NS), but SB length >/=73 mm and left main bifurcation were significant predictors for %FMM >/=10% (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with MV, SB supplies a smaller myocardial mass and showed less physiological severity despite similar stenosis severity. SB supplying a myocardial mass of %FMM>/=10%, which may benefit revascularization could be identified by vessel length >/=73 mm. Pre-procedural recognition of these findings may guide optimal revascularization strategy for bifurcation. | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Aged | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Area Under Curve | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Computed Tomography Angiography | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Coronary Angiography | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Coronary Artery Disease | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Coronary Stenosis | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Coronary Vessels | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Female | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Humans | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Male | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Middle Aged | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Multidetector Computed Tomography | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Myocardial Revascularization | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Predictive Value of Tests | - |
dc.subject.MESH | ROC Curve | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Registries | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Republic of Korea | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Severity of Illness Index | - |
dc.title | Identification of Coronary Artery Side Branch Supplying Myocardial Mass That May Benefit From Revascularization | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 28259665 | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | 임, 홍석 | - |
dc.type.local | Journal Papers | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.11.033 | - |
dc.citation.title | JACC. Cardiovascular interventions | - |
dc.citation.volume | 10 | - |
dc.citation.number | 6 | - |
dc.citation.date | 2017 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 571 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 581 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | JACC. Cardiovascular interventions, 10(6). : 571-581, 2017 | - |
dc.embargo.liftdate | 9999-12-31 | - |
dc.embargo.terms | 9999-12-31 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1876-7605 | - |
dc.relation.journalid | J019368798 | - |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.