Cited 0 times in
Low-dose midazolam and propofol use for conscious sedation during diagnostic endoscopy
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Kim, JH | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, DH | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, JH | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-10-21T07:20:17Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-10-21T07:20:17Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1607-551X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.ajou.ac.kr/handle/201003/18727 | - |
dc.description.abstract | To find the right sedation technique for different types of treatment methods and the right amount of sedatives so the chances of side effects happening can be reduced. This was a retrospective cohort analysis conducted on prospectively collected data. Patients who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy only (E group) were sub-divided into two subgroups: (a) Those who received 0.5 mg/kg of propofol (E-a), (b) Those who received 0.025 mg/kg of midazolam and 0.5 mg/kg of propofol (E-b). Patients who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy with colonoscopy (EC group) were also sub-divided into three subgroups: (a) Those who received 0.5 mg/kg of propofol (EC-a), (b) Those who received 0.025 mg/kg of midazolam and 0.5 mg/kg of propofol (EC-b), (c) Those who received 25 mg (12.5 mg if body weight < 50 kg or age > 70) of meperidine and 0.025 mg/kg of midazolam along with 0.5 mg/kg of propofol (EC-c). When the level of target was not reached, 10-20 mg of propofol was additionally injected. Sedation efficacy and safety were then compared among groups. E-b and EC-b decreased the overall amount of propofol and reduced side effect of temporary hypoxemia compared to E-a and EC-a. EC-b shortened patient recovery time compared to EC-c and reduced paradoxical reaction. In terms of the patient satisfaction and patient cooperation by endoscopists, there were no significant differences between EC-b and EC-c. Concomitant use of low dosages of both propofol and midazolam is found to be useful and safe when endoscopy needs to be performed. | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Colonoscopy | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Conscious Sedation | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Dose-Response Relationship, Drug | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Endoscopy, Digestive System | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Female | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Humans | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Male | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Midazolam | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Middle Aged | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Propofol | - |
dc.title | Low-dose midazolam and propofol use for conscious sedation during diagnostic endoscopy | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 30887720 | - |
dc.subject.keyword | conscious sedation | - |
dc.subject.keyword | endoscopy | - |
dc.subject.keyword | midazolam | - |
dc.subject.keyword | propofol | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | 김, 주형 | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | 김, 진홍 | - |
dc.type.local | Journal Papers | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1002/kjm2.12028 | - |
dc.citation.title | The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences | - |
dc.citation.volume | 35 | - |
dc.citation.number | 3 | - |
dc.citation.date | 2019 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 160 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 167 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences, 35(3). : 160-167, 2019 | - |
dc.embargo.liftdate | 9999-12-31 | - |
dc.embargo.terms | 9999-12-31 | - |
dc.relation.journalid | J01607551X | - |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.