Cited 0 times in
Selective Referral Using CCTA Versus Direct Referral for Individuals Referred to Invasive Coronary Angiography for Suspected CAD: A Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label Trial
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Chang, HJ | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lin, FY | - |
dc.contributor.author | Gebow, D | - |
dc.contributor.author | An, HY | - |
dc.contributor.author | Andreini, D | - |
dc.contributor.author | Bathina, R | - |
dc.contributor.author | Baggiano, A | - |
dc.contributor.author | Beltrama, V | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cerci, R | - |
dc.contributor.author | Choi, EY | - |
dc.contributor.author | Choi, JH | - |
dc.contributor.author | Choi, SY | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chung, N | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cole, J | - |
dc.contributor.author | Doh, JH | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ha, SJ | - |
dc.contributor.author | Her, AY | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kepka, C | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, JY | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, JW | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, SW | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, W | - |
dc.contributor.author | Pontone, G | - |
dc.contributor.author | Valeti, U | - |
dc.contributor.author | Villines, TC | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lu, Y | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kumar, A | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cho, I | - |
dc.contributor.author | Danad, I | - |
dc.contributor.author | Han, D | - |
dc.contributor.author | Heo, R | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, SE | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, JH | - |
dc.contributor.author | Park, HB | - |
dc.contributor.author | Sung, JM | - |
dc.contributor.author | Leflang, D | - |
dc.contributor.author | Zullo, J | - |
dc.contributor.author | Shaw, LJ | - |
dc.contributor.author | Min, JK | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-11-17T05:29:43Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-11-17T05:29:43Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1936-878X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.ajou.ac.kr/handle/201003/19097 | - |
dc.description.abstract | OBJECTIVES: This study compared the safety and diagnostic yield of a selective referral strategy using coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) compared with a direct referral strategy using invasive coronary angiography (ICA) as the index procedure.
BACKGROUND: Among patients presenting with signs and symptoms suggestive of coronary artery disease (CAD), a sizeable proportion who are referred to ICA do not have a significant, obstructive stenosis. METHODS: In a multinational, randomized clinical trial of patients referred to ICA for nonemergent indications, a selective referral strategy was compared with a direct referral strategy. The primary endpoint was noninferiority with a multiplicative margin of 1.33 of composite major adverse cardiovascular events (blindly adjudicated death, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, stroke, urgent and/or emergent coronary revascularization or cardiac hospitalization) at a median follow-up of 1-year. RESULTS: At 22 sites, 823 subjects were randomized to a selective referral and 808 to a direct referral strategy. At 1 year, selective referral met the noninferiority margin of 1.33 (p = 0.026) with a similar event rate between the randomized arms of the trial (4.6% vs. 4.6%: hazard ratio: 0.99: 95% confidence interval: 0.66 to 1.47). Following CCTA, only 23% of the selective referral arm went on to ICA, which was a rate lower than that of the direct referral strategy. Coronary revascularization occurred less often in the selective referral group compared with the direct referral to ICA (13% vs. 18%: p < 0.001). Rates of normal ICA were 24.6% in the selective referral arm compared with 61.1% in the direct referral arm of the trial (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In stable patients with suspected CAD who are eligible for ICA, the comparable 1-year major adverse cardiovascular events rates following a selective referral and direct referral strategy suggests that both diagnostic approaches are similarly effective. In the selective referral strategy, the reduced use of ICA was associated with a greater diagnostic yield, which supported the usefulness of CCTA as an efficient and accurate method to guide decisions of ICA performance. (Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Selective Cardiac Catheterization [CONSERVE]: NCT01810198). | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Aged | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Asia | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Computed Tomography Angiography | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Coronary Angiography | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Coronary Artery Disease | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Europe | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Female | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Humans | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Male | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Middle Aged | - |
dc.subject.MESH | North America | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Predictive Value of Tests | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Prognosis | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Referral and Consultation | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Time Factors | - |
dc.title | Selective Referral Using CCTA Versus Direct Referral for Individuals Referred to Invasive Coronary Angiography for Suspected CAD: A Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label Trial | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 30553687 | - |
dc.subject.keyword | coronary computed tomographic angiography | - |
dc.subject.keyword | invasive coronary angiography | - |
dc.subject.keyword | major adverse cardiac events | - |
dc.subject.keyword | stable ischemic heart disease | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | 최, 소연 | - |
dc.type.local | Journal Papers | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.09.018 | - |
dc.citation.title | JACC. Cardiovascular imaging | - |
dc.citation.volume | 12 | - |
dc.citation.number | 7 Pt 2 | - |
dc.citation.date | 2019 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 1303 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 1312 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | JACC. Cardiovascular imaging, 12(7 Pt 2). : 1303-1312, 2019 | - |
dc.embargo.liftdate | 9999-12-31 | - |
dc.embargo.terms | 9999-12-31 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1876-7591 | - |
dc.relation.journalid | J01936878X | - |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.