Cited 0 times in Scipus Cited Count

Multifactorial analysis of the surgical outcomes of giant congenital melanocytic nevi: Single versus serial tissue expansion

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKim, MJ-
dc.contributor.authorLee, DH-
dc.contributor.authorPark, DH-
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-07T05:53:42Z-
dc.date.available2022-12-07T05:53:42Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.issn2234-6163-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.ajou.ac.kr/handle/201003/23237-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Giant congenital melanocytic nevus (GCMN) is a rare disease, for which complete surgical resection is recommended. However, the size of the lesions presents problems for the management of the condition. The most popular approach is to use a tissue expander; however, single-stage expansion in reconstructive surgery for GCMN cannot always address the entire defect. Few reports have compared tissue expansion techniques. The present study compared single and serial expansion to analyze the risk factors for complications and the surgical outcomes of the two techniques. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical charts of patients who underwent tissue expander reconstruction between March 2011 and July 2019. Serial expansion was indicated in cases of anatomically obvious defects after the first expansion, limited skin expansion with two more expander insertions, or capsular contracture after removal of the first expander. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients (88 cases) were analyzed, of whom 31 underwent serial expansion. The number of expanders inserted was higher in the serial-expansion group (P<0.001). The back and lower extremities were the most common locations for single and serial expansion, respectively (P=0.043). Multivariate analysis showed that sex (odds ratio [OR], 0.257; P=0.015), expander size (OR, 1.016; P=0.015), and inflation volume (OR, 0.987; P=0.015) were risk factors for complications. CONCLUSIONS: Serial expansion is a good option for GCMN management. We demonstrated that large-sized expanders and large inflation volumes can lead to complications, and therefore require risk-reducing strategies. Nonetheless, serial expansion with proper management is appropriate for certain patients and can provide aesthetically satisfactory outcomes.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.titleMultifactorial analysis of the surgical outcomes of giant congenital melanocytic nevi: Single versus serial tissue expansion-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.pmid33238342-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7700868-
dc.subject.keywordNevus, pigmented-
dc.subject.keywordSkin neoplasms-
dc.subject.keywordTissue expansion-
dc.subject.keywordTissue expansion devices-
dc.subject.keywordSurgical flaps-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, MJ-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorPark, DH-
dc.type.localJournal Papers-
dc.identifier.doi10.5999/aps.2020.01494-
dc.citation.titleArchives of plastic surgery-
dc.citation.volume47-
dc.citation.number6-
dc.citation.date2020-
dc.citation.startPage551-
dc.citation.endPage558-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationArchives of plastic surgery, 47(6). : 551-558, 2020-
dc.identifier.eissn2234-6171-
dc.relation.journalidJ022346163-
Appears in Collections:
Journal Papers > School of Medicine / Graduate School of Medicine > Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery
Files in This Item:
33238342.pdfDownload

qrcode

해당 아이템을 이메일로 공유하기 원하시면 인증을 거치시기 바랍니다.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse