Cited 0 times in
5-Year Outcome of Simple Crossover Stenting in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions Compared With Side Branch Opening
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Lee, CH | - |
dc.contributor.author | Nam, CW | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cho, YK | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yoon, HJ | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, KB | - |
dc.contributor.author | Gwon, HC | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, HS | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chun, WJ | - |
dc.contributor.author | Han, SH | - |
dc.contributor.author | Rha, SW | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chae, IH | - |
dc.contributor.author | Jeong, JO | - |
dc.contributor.author | Heo, JH | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yoon, J | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lim, DS | - |
dc.contributor.author | Park, JS | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hong, MK | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, SY | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cha, KS | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, DI | - |
dc.contributor.author | Bae, JW | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chang, K | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hwang, BH | - |
dc.contributor.author | Choi, SY | - |
dc.contributor.author | Jeong, MH | - |
dc.contributor.author | Choi, KH | - |
dc.contributor.author | Song, YB | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hong, SJ | - |
dc.contributor.author | Doh, JH | - |
dc.contributor.author | Koo, BK | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hur, SH | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-12-16T05:44:42Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-12-16T05:44:42Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.ajou.ac.kr/handle/201003/23412 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: The optimal side branch (SB) treatment strategy after simple crossover stenting in bifurcation lesions is still controversial. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term outcomes of a 1-stent strategy with simple crossover alone versus with an additional SB–opening procedure in patients with left main (LM) and non-LM coronary bifurcation lesions. Methods: Patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with a 1-stent strategy for bifurcation lesions including LM were selected from the COBIS (Coronary Bifurcation Stenting) III registry and divided into the simple crossover–alone group and SB-opening group. Clinical outcomes were assessed by the 5-year rate of target lesion failure (a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and target lesion repeat revascularization). Results: Among 2,194 patients who underwent the 1-stent strategy, 1,685 (76.8%) patients were treated with simple crossover alone, and 509 (23.2%) patients were treated with an additional SB-opening procedure. Although the baseline SB angiographic disease was more severe in the SB-opening group, the final lumen diameter of the SB was larger. The 5-year observed target lesion failure rate was similar between the 2 groups (7.0% in the simple crossover vs. 6.7% in SB-opening group; hazard ratio: 0.99; 95% confidence interval: 0.66 to 1.48; p = 0.947), even in the subgroup analyses including LM (9.5% vs. 11.3%; p = 0.442) and true bifurcation (5.3% vs. 7.8%; p = 0.362). The results were not changed after an inverse probability of treatment weighting adjustment. There was no difference in the overall and SB-related target lesion revascularization rate in both groups. Conclusions: The long-term clinical outcome of the 1-stent strategy with simple crossover alone for coronary bifurcation lesions was acceptable compared to those of additional SB-opening procedures. (Korean Coronary Bifurcation Stenting [COBIS] Registry III [COBIS III]; NCT03068494) | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.title | 5-Year Outcome of Simple Crossover Stenting in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions Compared With Side Branch Opening | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 36338374 | - |
dc.identifier.url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9627822/ | - |
dc.subject.keyword | bifurcation disease | - |
dc.subject.keyword | clinical outcome | - |
dc.subject.keyword | percutaneous coronary intervention | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Choi, SY | - |
dc.type.local | Journal Papers | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jacasi.2021.04.002 | - |
dc.citation.title | JACC. Asia | - |
dc.citation.volume | 1 | - |
dc.citation.number | 1 | - |
dc.citation.date | 2021 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 53 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 64 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | JACC. Asia, 1(1). : 53-64, 2021 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2772-3747 | - |
dc.relation.journalid | J027723747 | - |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.