Cited 0 times in
Performance evaluation of coaguchek pro II in comparison with coaguchek XS plus and sta-r Max using a sta-neoplastine CI plus
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Nam, M | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hur, M | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, H | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yoon, S | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, S | - |
dc.contributor.author | Shin, S | - |
dc.contributor.author | Moon, HW | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yun, YM | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-01-05T03:03:23Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-01-05T03:03:23Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1751-5521 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.ajou.ac.kr/handle/201003/23679 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction: We evaluated the analytical performance of CoaguChek Pro II (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany), a new point-of-care device measuring the international normalized ratio (INR) values, in comparison with CoaguChek XS Plus (Roche Diagnostics GmbH) and STA-R Max using STA-Neoplastine CI Plus (Diagnostica Stago SAS, Asnières-sur-Seine, France). Methods: The precision of Pro II was analyzed, according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines (CLSI POCT14-A2 and EP15-A3). In 105 clinical samples, the Pro II INR values were compared with those of XS Plus and STA-R Max using STA-Neoplastine CI Plus (CLSI EP09-A3 and EP35). We also compared the Pro II INR values between capillary blood (CB) and venous blood (VB; CLSI EP35). Results: The precision of Pro II was acceptable (within-run and between-run CV%: 2.71% and 3.28% at normal level; 1.52% and 4.47% at abnormal level, respectively). The Pro II INR values showed very high correlation and almost perfect agreement with those of XS Plus and STA-R Max using STA-Neoplastine CI Plus (r =.97 and κ =.94; r =.95 and κ =.91). The mean difference between Pro II and STA-R Max using STA-Neoplastine CI Plus increased as INR values increased, with 60% of samples showing differences >0.5 in the supratherapeutic range. The Pro II INR values showed very high correlation between CB and VB (r =.98). Conclusion: Pro II INR values are accurate and reliable using both CB and VB; however, they should be confirmed by laboratory analyzers in the supratherapeutic range. | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Blood Coagulation | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Blood Coagulation Tests | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Female | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Humans | - |
dc.subject.MESH | International Normalized Ratio | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Male | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Middle Aged | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Point-of-Care Systems | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Sensitivity and Specificity | - |
dc.title | Performance evaluation of coaguchek pro II in comparison with coaguchek XS plus and sta-r Max using a sta-neoplastine CI plus | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 33460254 | - |
dc.subject.keyword | capillary blood | - |
dc.subject.keyword | CoaguChek Pro II | - |
dc.subject.keyword | comparison | - |
dc.subject.keyword | international normalized ratio | - |
dc.subject.keyword | performance | - |
dc.subject.keyword | point-of-care devices | - |
dc.subject.keyword | venous blood | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Lee, S | - |
dc.type.local | Journal Papers | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/ijlh.13466 | - |
dc.citation.title | International journal of laboratory hematology | - |
dc.citation.volume | 43 | - |
dc.citation.number | 5 | - |
dc.citation.date | 2021 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 1191 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 1197 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | International journal of laboratory hematology, 43(5). : 1191-1197, 2021 | - |
dc.embargo.liftdate | 9999-12-31 | - |
dc.embargo.terms | 9999-12-31 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1751-553X | - |
dc.relation.journalid | J017515521 | - |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.