Cited 0 times in Scipus Cited Count

Performance evaluation of coaguchek pro II in comparison with coaguchek XS plus and sta-r Max using a sta-neoplastine CI plus

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorNam, M-
dc.contributor.authorHur, M-
dc.contributor.authorKim, H-
dc.contributor.authorYoon, S-
dc.contributor.authorLee, S-
dc.contributor.authorShin, S-
dc.contributor.authorMoon, HW-
dc.contributor.authorYun, YM-
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-05T03:03:23Z-
dc.date.available2023-01-05T03:03:23Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.issn1751-5521-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.ajou.ac.kr/handle/201003/23679-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: We evaluated the analytical performance of CoaguChek Pro II (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany), a new point-of-care device measuring the international normalized ratio (INR) values, in comparison with CoaguChek XS Plus (Roche Diagnostics GmbH) and STA-R Max using STA-Neoplastine CI Plus (Diagnostica Stago SAS, Asnières-sur-Seine, France). Methods: The precision of Pro II was analyzed, according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines (CLSI POCT14-A2 and EP15-A3). In 105 clinical samples, the Pro II INR values were compared with those of XS Plus and STA-R Max using STA-Neoplastine CI Plus (CLSI EP09-A3 and EP35). We also compared the Pro II INR values between capillary blood (CB) and venous blood (VB; CLSI EP35). Results: The precision of Pro II was acceptable (within-run and between-run CV%: 2.71% and 3.28% at normal level; 1.52% and 4.47% at abnormal level, respectively). The Pro II INR values showed very high correlation and almost perfect agreement with those of XS Plus and STA-R Max using STA-Neoplastine CI Plus (r =.97 and κ =.94; r =.95 and κ =.91). The mean difference between Pro II and STA-R Max using STA-Neoplastine CI Plus increased as INR values increased, with 60% of samples showing differences >0.5 in the supratherapeutic range. The Pro II INR values showed very high correlation between CB and VB (r =.98). Conclusion: Pro II INR values are accurate and reliable using both CB and VB; however, they should be confirmed by laboratory analyzers in the supratherapeutic range.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.subject.MESHBlood Coagulation-
dc.subject.MESHBlood Coagulation Tests-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHInternational Normalized Ratio-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHPoint-of-Care Systems-
dc.subject.MESHSensitivity and Specificity-
dc.titlePerformance evaluation of coaguchek pro II in comparison with coaguchek XS plus and sta-r Max using a sta-neoplastine CI plus-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.pmid33460254-
dc.subject.keywordcapillary blood-
dc.subject.keywordCoaguChek Pro II-
dc.subject.keywordcomparison-
dc.subject.keywordinternational normalized ratio-
dc.subject.keywordperformance-
dc.subject.keywordpoint-of-care devices-
dc.subject.keywordvenous blood-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorLee, S-
dc.type.localJournal Papers-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ijlh.13466-
dc.citation.titleInternational journal of laboratory hematology-
dc.citation.volume43-
dc.citation.number5-
dc.citation.date2021-
dc.citation.startPage1191-
dc.citation.endPage1197-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationInternational journal of laboratory hematology, 43(5). : 1191-1197, 2021-
dc.embargo.liftdate9999-12-31-
dc.embargo.terms9999-12-31-
dc.identifier.eissn1751-553X-
dc.relation.journalidJ017515521-
Appears in Collections:
Journal Papers > School of Medicine / Graduate School of Medicine > Occupational & Environmental Medicine
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

qrcode

해당 아이템을 이메일로 공유하기 원하시면 인증을 거치시기 바랍니다.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse