Cited 0 times in
Cell membrane and nuclear expression of programmed death ligand-1 in prostate needle biopsy tissue in prostate cancer patients undergoing primary radiation therapy
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Shim, KH | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kwon, JE | - |
dc.contributor.author | Park, SG | - |
dc.contributor.author | Choo, SH | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, SJ | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, SI | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-01-05T03:03:36Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-01-05T03:03:36Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1078-1439 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.ajou.ac.kr/handle/201003/23728 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression in cancer is often associated with cancer aggressiveness and responsiveness to treatment with PD-1 pathway inhibitors. We conducted a systematic study on the expression of membranous PD-L1 (mPD-L1) and nuclear PD-1-L1 (nPD-L1) in prostate needle biopsy specimens of prostate cancer patients who underwent primary radiotherapy and analyzed the association between PD-L1 expression and clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of patients. Method: A total of 971 cancer-containing prostate needle biopsy cores from 172 patients were immunohistochemically stained with anti-PD-L1 antibody. The association of PD-L1 expression with Gleason score and tumor volume percentage was evaluated for each biopsy core. Total of 171 patients were divided according to mPD-L1 or nPD-L1 expression, and clinicopathological characteristics were compared between the positive and negative groups. The prognostic significance of mPD-L1, nPD-L1 and common prognostic factors were analyzed in terms of biochemical recurrence. Result: Total of 15% and 46% of biopsy cores were stained positive for mPD-L1 and nPD-L1, respectively. There was a positive correlation between Gleason score and mPD-L1 and a negative correlation between Gleason score and nPD-L1. Between mPD-L1 and nPD-L1, there was no significant correlation. There was intraindividual heterogeneity in PD-L1 expression among different Gleason scores. For mPD-L1, only pretreatment PSA was significantly higher in the positive group than in the negative, but not Gleason score and T stage. For nPD-L1, Gleason score and T stage were significantly higher in the positive group than in the negative. Both mPD-L1 and nPD-L1 expression were not predictive of BCR-free survival in univariate and multivariate analyses. Conclusions: Our results suggest that PD-1 pathway inhibitor may be a potential therapeutic option in high risk prostate cancer patients as early as neoadjuvant setting. The novel discovery of PD-L1 expression in the nucleus of PC should be subjected to further research. | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Aged | - |
dc.subject.MESH | B7-H1 Antigen | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Biopsy, Needle | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Cell Membrane | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Cell Nucleus | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Humans | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Male | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Middle Aged | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Prostate | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Prostatic Neoplasms | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Retrospective Studies | - |
dc.title | Cell membrane and nuclear expression of programmed death ligand-1 in prostate needle biopsy tissue in prostate cancer patients undergoing primary radiation therapy | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 33712343 | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Immunohistochemistry | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Programmed death ligand-1 | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Prostate cancer | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Shim, KH | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Kwon, JE | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Choo, SH | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Kim, SJ | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Kim, SI | - |
dc.type.local | Journal Papers | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.01.032 | - |
dc.citation.title | Urologic oncology | - |
dc.citation.volume | 39 | - |
dc.citation.number | 5 | - |
dc.citation.date | 2021 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 298.e13 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 298.e20 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | Urologic oncology, 39(5). : 298.e13-298.e20, 2021 | - |
dc.embargo.liftdate | 9999-12-31 | - |
dc.embargo.terms | 9999-12-31 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1873-2496 | - |
dc.relation.journalid | J010781439 | - |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.