Cited 0 times in
Clinical Trial to Reconfirm the Efficacy and Safety of Cefetamet Pivoxil Treatment in Sinusitis Patients: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Parallel Designed, Multicenter, Active Comparator Study (CASIS Study)
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Park, CS | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cho, JH | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, HM | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, KS | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, JK | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, DY | - |
dc.contributor.author | Baek, BJ | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, HJ | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, YD | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hwang, CS | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, ST | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cho, SH | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, YM | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, SH | - |
dc.contributor.author | Jeong, JH | - |
dc.contributor.author | In, SM | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, BG | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-01-26T06:10:07Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-01-26T06:10:07Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0145-5613 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.ajou.ac.kr/handle/201003/23995 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of cefetamet pivoxil for the treatment of acute bacterial rhinosinusitis in Korean patients compared to treatment with cefdinir. Methods: A prospective, multicenter, randomized double-blind, comparative study was conducted by the Departments of Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery at 17 hospitals or universities in the Republic of Korea from March 2017 to April 2019. A total of 309 patients were screened and 249 patients participated in the study. Results: Treatment with cefetamet pivoxil for 2 weeks showed 82.4% clinical cure and improvement rates in patients with acute bacterial rhinosinusitis compared to 84.68% in those taking cefdinir for 2 weeks, showing that cefetamet pivoxil administered twice a day for 2 weeks was as effective as cefdinir 3 times a day for 2 weeks for the treatment of acute bacterial rhinosinusitis. The overall adverse reaction rates of both drugs were 10.56% in the cefetamet pivoxil group and 15.49% in the cefdinir group, without serious adverse events or drug reactions. Conclusions: Cefetamet pivoxil twice a day was as efficacious and safe as cefdinir 3 times a day for the treatment of acute bacterial rhinosinusitis, which suggested that cefetamet pivoxil may be a suitable alternative to cefdinir. | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.title | Clinical Trial to Reconfirm the Efficacy and Safety of Cefetamet Pivoxil Treatment in Sinusitis Patients: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Parallel Designed, Multicenter, Active Comparator Study (CASIS Study) | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 34427151 | - |
dc.identifier.url | https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/01455613211036236?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%20%200pubmed | - |
dc.subject.keyword | acute bacterial rhinosinusitis | - |
dc.subject.keyword | cefdinir | - |
dc.subject.keyword | cefetamet | - |
dc.subject.keyword | comparative study | - |
dc.subject.keyword | double-blinded method | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Kim, HJ | - |
dc.type.local | Journal Papers | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/01455613211036236 | - |
dc.citation.title | Ear, nose, & throat journal | - |
dc.citation.date | 2021 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 1455613211036236 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 1455613211036236 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | Ear, nose, & throat journal, : 1455613211036236-1455613211036236, 2021 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1942-7522 | - |
dc.relation.journalid | J001455613 | - |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.