Cited 0 times in
Prognostic Implications of Fractional Flow Reserve after Coronary Stenting: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Hwang, D | - |
dc.contributor.author | Koo, BK | - |
dc.contributor.author | Zhang, J | - |
dc.contributor.author | Park, J | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yang, S | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, M | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yun, JP | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, JM | - |
dc.contributor.author | Nam, CW | - |
dc.contributor.author | Shin, ES | - |
dc.contributor.author | Doh, JH | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chen, SL | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kakuta, T | - |
dc.contributor.author | Toth, GG | - |
dc.contributor.author | Piroth, Z | - |
dc.contributor.author | Johnson, NP | - |
dc.contributor.author | Pijls, NHJ | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hakeem, A | - |
dc.contributor.author | Uretsky, BF | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hokama, Y | - |
dc.contributor.author | Tanaka, N | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lim, HS | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ito, T | - |
dc.contributor.author | Matsuo, A | - |
dc.contributor.author | Azzalini, L | - |
dc.contributor.author | Leesar, MA | - |
dc.contributor.author | Neleman, T | - |
dc.contributor.author | van Mieghem, NM | - |
dc.contributor.author | Diletti, R | - |
dc.contributor.author | Daemen, J | - |
dc.contributor.author | Collison, D | - |
dc.contributor.author | Collet, C | - |
dc.contributor.author | De Bruyne, B | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-02-13T06:23:26Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-02-13T06:23:26Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.ajou.ac.kr/handle/201003/24578 | - |
dc.description.abstract | IMPORTANCE: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is generally considered to reflect residual disease. Yet the clinical relevance of post-PCI FFR after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical relevance of post-PCI FFR measurement after DES implantation. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for relevant published articles from inception to June 18, 2022. STUDY SELECTION: Published articles that reported post-PCI FFR after DES implantation and its association with clinical outcomes were included. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Patient-level data were collected from the corresponding authors of 17 cohorts using a standardized spreadsheet. Meta-estimates for primary and secondary outcomes were analyzed per patient and using mixed-effects Cox proportional hazard regression with registry identifiers included as a random effect. All processes followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was target vessel failure (TVF) at 2 years, a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TVMI), and target vessel revascularization (TVR). The secondary outcome was a composite of cardiac death or TVMI at 2 years. RESULTS: Of 2268 articles identified, 29 studies met selection criteria. Of these, 28 articles from 17 cohorts provided data, including a total of 5277 patients with 5869 vessels who underwent FFR measurement after DES implantation. Mean (SD) age was 64.4 (10.1) years and 4141 patients (78.5%) were men. Median (IQR) post-PCI FFR was 0.89 (0.84-0.94) and 690 vessels (11.8%) had a post-PCI FFR of 0.80 or below. The cumulative incidence of TVF was 340 patients (7.2%), with cardiac death or TVMI occurring in 111 patients (2.4%) at 2 years. Lower post-PCI FFR significantly increased the risk of TVF (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] per 0.01 FFR decrease, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02-1.05; P < .001). The risk of cardiac death or MI also increased inversely with post-PCI FFR (adjusted HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.00-1.07, P = .049). These associations were consistent regardless of age, sex, the presence of hypertension or diabetes, and clinical diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Reduced FFR after DES implantation was common and associated with the risks of TVF and of cardiac death or TVMI. These results indicate the prognostic value of post-PCI physiologic assessment after DES implantation. | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Coronary Angiography | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Death | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Drug-Eluting Stents | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Female | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Humans | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Male | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Middle Aged | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Myocardial Infarction | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Percutaneous Coronary Intervention | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Prognosis | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Treatment Outcome | - |
dc.title | Prognostic Implications of Fractional Flow Reserve after Coronary Stenting: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 36136329 | - |
dc.identifier.url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9500557 | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Lim, HS | - |
dc.type.local | Journal Papers | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.32842 | - |
dc.citation.title | JAMA network open | - |
dc.citation.volume | 5 | - |
dc.citation.number | 9 | - |
dc.citation.date | 2022 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | E2232842 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | E2232842 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | JAMA network open, 5(9). : E2232842-E2232842, 2022 | - |
dc.embargo.liftdate | 9999-12-31 | - |
dc.embargo.terms | 9999-12-31 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2574-3805 | - |
dc.relation.journalid | J025743805 | - |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.