Cited 0 times in Scipus Cited Count

Efficacy of Second-Line Treatments in Chronic Urticaria Refractory to Standard Dose Antihistamines

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKim, MA-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, JH-
dc.contributor.authorShin, YS-
dc.contributor.authorPark, HS-
dc.contributor.authorYe, YM-
dc.contributor.authorKAAACI Work Group on Urticaria/Angioedema/Anaphylaxis-
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-11T06:01:39Z-
dc.date.available2023-09-11T06:01:39Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.issn2092-7355-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.ajou.ac.kr/handle/201003/26318-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The prevalence of chronic urticaria (CU) is increasing worldwide, and it imposes a major burden on patients. Few studies have evaluated the efficacy of second-line treatments of CU, particularly for patients being considered for costly third-line treatments such as omalizumab. We compared the efficacy and safety of second-line treatments of CU refractory to standard doses of nonsedating H1-antihistamines (nsAHs). Methods: This 4-week, prospective, randomized, open-label trial divided patients into 4 treatment groups: 4-fold updosing of nsAHs, multiple combination of 4 nsAHs, switching to other nsAHs, and adjunctive H2-receptor antagonist. The clinical outcomes included urticaria control status, symptoms, and rescue medication use. Results: This study included 109 patients. After 4 weeks of second-line treatment, urticaria was well-controlled, partly controlled, and uncontrolled in 43.1%, 36.7%, and 20.2% of patients, respectively. Complete control of CU was achieved in 20.4% of patients. Among the patients with high-dose nsAHs, the proportion with well-controlled status was higher compared to the patients who received standard doses (51.9% vs. 34.5%, P = 0.031). No significant difference was observed in the proportion of well-controlled cases between the updosing and combination treatment groups (57.7% vs. 46.4%, P = 0.616). However, increasing the dose of nsAHs 4-fold was associated with a higher rate of complete symptom control compared to multiple combination treatment with 4 nsAHs (40.0% vs. 10.7%, P = 0.030). Logistic regression analysis confirmed the higher efficacy of updosing of nsAHs for complete control of CU compared to the other treatment strategies (odds ratio, 0.180; P = 0.020). Conclusions: In patients with CU refractory to standard doses of nsAHs, both updosing of nsAHs 4-fold and multiple combination treatment with 4 nsAHs increased the rate of well-controlled cases without causing significant adverse effects. Updosing of nsAHs is more effective for complete CU control than combination treatment.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.titleEfficacy of Second-Line Treatments in Chronic Urticaria Refractory to Standard Dose Antihistamines-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.pmid37153977-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10359646-
dc.subject.keywordChronic urticaria-
dc.subject.keywordefficacy-
dc.subject.keywordhistamine H1 antagonist, nonsedating-
dc.subject.keywordsafety-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorShin, YS-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorPark, HS-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorYe, YM-
dc.type.localJournal Papers-
dc.identifier.doi10.4168/aair.2023.15.4.496-
dc.citation.titleAllergy, asthma & immunology research-
dc.citation.volume15-
dc.citation.number4-
dc.citation.date2023-
dc.citation.startPage496-
dc.citation.endPage511-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationAllergy, asthma & immunology research, 15(4). : 496-511, 2023-
dc.identifier.eissn2092-7363-
dc.relation.journalidJ020927355-
Appears in Collections:
Journal Papers > School of Medicine / Graduate School of Medicine > Allergy
Files in This Item:
37153977.pdfDownload

qrcode

해당 아이템을 이메일로 공유하기 원하시면 인증을 거치시기 바랍니다.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse