Cited 0 times in
Prognostic significance of systematic lymphadenectomy as part of primary debulking surgery in patients with advanced ovarian cancer
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Chang, SJ | - |
dc.contributor.author | Bristow, RE | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ryu, HS | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-04-29T01:57:23Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2013-04-29T01:57:23Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0090-8258 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.ajou.ac.kr/handle/201003/8053 | - |
dc.description.abstract | OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy on survival in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 189 consecutive patients with FIGO stage IIIC ovarian cancer between 2000 and 2011, who underwent primary cytoreductive surgery followed by platinum- and taxane-based chemotherapy. All patients were classified into two groups - patients who underwent systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy and those who did not. Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) times were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Patients who underwent systematic lymphadenectomy had significantly improved PFS (22 versus 9 months, p<0.01) and OS (66 versus 40 months, p<0.01). In patients with no gross residual disease (NGR) or residual disease 0.1-1cm (GR-1), the median OS time of those who had lymphadenectomy was significantly longer than those who did not (86 versus 46 months, p=0.02). However, in patients with residual disease >1cm (GR-B), there was no significant difference in OS according to lymphadenectomy (39 versus 40 months, p=0.50). Among patients with NGR, the median OS time of those who underwent systematic lymphadenectomy was significantly longer than those who did not undergo lymphadenectomy (not yet reached [>96] and 56 months, p<0.01). No significant difference of OS between patients with and without lymphadenectomy was observed in the subgroup of patients with GR-1 (50 versus 38 months, p=0.44). The performance of lymphadenectomy was a statistically significant and independent predictor of improved OS in addition to the status of residual disease and the performance of radical cytoreductive procedures (hazard ratio, 0.34; [95% CI, 0.23-0.52]; p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Systematic lymphadenectomy may have a therapeutic value and be significantly associated with improved survival in stage IIIC ovarian cancer patients with grossly no visible residual disease. | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Adult | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Aged | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Aorta | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Carboplatin | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Carcinoma | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Chemotherapy, Adjuvant | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Cisplatin | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Disease-Free Survival | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Fallopian Tube Neoplasms | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Female | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Humans | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Kaplan-Meier Estimate | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Lymph Node Excision | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Middle Aged | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Neoplasm Grading | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Neoplasm, Residual | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Ovarian Neoplasms | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Paclitaxel | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Pelvis | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Peritoneal Neoplasms | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Proportional Hazards Models | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Retrospective Studies | - |
dc.title | Prognostic significance of systematic lymphadenectomy as part of primary debulking surgery in patients with advanced ovarian cancer | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 22609747 | - |
dc.identifier.url | http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0090-8258(12)00358-7 | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | 장, 석준 | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | 유, 희석 | - |
dc.type.local | Journal Papers | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.05.014 | - |
dc.citation.title | Gynecologic oncology | - |
dc.citation.volume | 126 | - |
dc.citation.number | 3 | - |
dc.citation.date | 2012 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 381 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 386 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | Gynecologic oncology, 126(3). : 381-386, 2012 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1095-6859 | - |
dc.relation.journalid | J000908258 | - |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.