Cited 0 times in Scipus Cited Count

Selective Referral Using CCTA Versus Direct Referral for Individuals Referred to Invasive Coronary Angiography for Suspected CAD: A Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label Trial

Authors
Chang, HJ | Lin, FY | Gebow, D | An, HY | Andreini, D | Bathina, R | Baggiano, A | Beltrama, V | Cerci, R | Choi, EY | Choi, JH | Choi, SY  | Chung, N | Cole, J | Doh, JH | Ha, SJ | Her, AY | Kepka, C | Kim, JY | Kim, JW | Kim, SW | Kim, W | Pontone, G | Valeti, U | Villines, TC | Lu, Y | Kumar, A | Cho, I | Danad, I | Han, D | Heo, R | Lee, SE | Lee, JH | Park, HB | Sung, JM | Leflang, D | Zullo, J | Shaw, LJ | Min, JK
Citation
JACC. Cardiovascular imaging, 12(7 Pt 2). : 1303-1312, 2019
Journal Title
JACC. Cardiovascular imaging
ISSN
1936-878X1876-7591
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study compared the safety and diagnostic yield of a selective referral strategy using coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) compared with a direct referral strategy using invasive coronary angiography (ICA) as the index procedure.
BACKGROUND: Among patients presenting with signs and symptoms suggestive of coronary artery disease (CAD), a sizeable proportion who are referred to ICA do not have a significant, obstructive stenosis.
METHODS: In a multinational, randomized clinical trial of patients referred to ICA for nonemergent indications, a selective referral strategy was compared with a direct referral strategy. The primary endpoint was noninferiority with a multiplicative margin of 1.33 of composite major adverse cardiovascular events (blindly adjudicated death, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, stroke, urgent and/or emergent coronary revascularization or cardiac hospitalization) at a median follow-up of 1-year.
RESULTS: At 22 sites, 823 subjects were randomized to a selective referral and 808 to a direct referral strategy. At 1 year, selective referral met the noninferiority margin of 1.33 (p = 0.026) with a similar event rate between the randomized arms of the trial (4.6% vs. 4.6%: hazard ratio: 0.99: 95% confidence interval: 0.66 to 1.47). Following CCTA, only 23% of the selective referral arm went on to ICA, which was a rate lower than that of the direct referral strategy. Coronary revascularization occurred less often in the selective referral group compared with the direct referral to ICA (13% vs. 18%: p < 0.001). Rates of normal ICA were 24.6% in the selective referral arm compared with 61.1% in the direct referral arm of the trial (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: In stable patients with suspected CAD who are eligible for ICA, the comparable 1-year major adverse cardiovascular events rates following a selective referral and direct referral strategy suggests that both diagnostic approaches are similarly effective. In the selective referral strategy, the reduced use of ICA was associated with a greater diagnostic yield, which supported the usefulness of CCTA as an efficient and accurate method to guide decisions of ICA performance. (Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Selective Cardiac Catheterization [CONSERVE]: NCT01810198).
Keywords

MeSH

DOI
10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.09.018
PMID
30553687
Appears in Collections:
Journal Papers > School of Medicine / Graduate School of Medicine > Cardiology
Ajou Authors
최, 소연
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export

qrcode

해당 아이템을 이메일로 공유하기 원하시면 인증을 거치시기 바랍니다.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse